| Properties of CMC Solutions Viscosity is the single most important property of CMC solutions. Aqualon has acquired considerable information on factors affecting viscosity, and these data are given here. Stability of CMC solutions to microbiological attack and chemical deterioration is also discussed in this section. Viscosity Solutions of CMC can be prepared in a wide range of viscosities. Such solutions are non-Newtonian because they change in viscosity with change in shear rate. Consequently, it is essential to standardize viscosity determination methods. This standardization must include the type and extent of agitation used to dissolve the CMC, as well as precise control of temperature, conditions of shear, and method of viscosity measurement. The procedure used in the Aqualon control laboratory is described in detail in the Appendix. Effect of Concentration The viscosity of aqueous CMC solutions increases rapidly with concentration. This is shown in Figure 10. The bands show the range of viscosity obtainable with standard viscosity types. Effect of Blending Two viscosity types of CMC can be blended to obtain an intermediate viscosity. Because viscosity is an exponential function, the viscosity resulting from blending is not an arithmetic mean. A blending chart (VC-440), available from Aqualon, can be used to determine the result of blending various amounts of two viscosity types of CMC. It can also be used to determine the amount of CMC required to achieve a desired viscosity when blending two types of known viscosity. Blending Chart The blending technique outlined in this bulletin can be used for Aqualon® cellulose gum (sodium carboxymethylcellulose), Natrosol® hydroxyethylcellulose, Culminal® methylcellulose and methyl hydroxypropylcellulose and Klucel® hydroxypropylcellulose. This technique is useful when it is desirable to blend two viscosity types of the same water-soluble polymer in order to obtain a solution having a predetermined viscosity and solids concentration. Blends can be calculated directly from the equation that follows; or, more conveniently, the blending chart in Figure 9 can be used. From this chart, one can determine, without calculations, the percentage of any two viscosities that must be blended to secure a desired intermediate viscosity. Likewise, it is possible to determine the viscosity that will result from utilizing any blend. Equation: Because the viscosity-concentration relationship an exponential function, the viscosity resulting from blending is not an arithmetic mean. The viscosity of a blend can, however, be approximated by use of the equation below, which is derived from the Arrhenius equation that relates viscosity with polymer concentration. |
| n log V1 + (100-n) log V2
|
||
| Log Vs | = | 100 |
| where Vs | = | Viscosity sought |
| n | = | Percent (by weight) of the first component of theblend having a viscosity of V1 |
| V2 | = | Viscosity of the second component of the blend |
| Note: All viscosities must be expressed at the same polymer concentration and in the same units. | ||
| Use of the chart itself is simple. For example, suppose one wishes to obtain a solution with a viscosity of 900 cps at 3% concentration. The water-soluble polymer is available as Material A with a viscosity of 1,800 cps at 3% concentration, and Material B with a viscosity of 700 cps at 3% concentration. A line is drawn connecting these two viscosities on the chart. The point at which this line intersects the desired viscosity line is then determined, and the percentage it represents is read from the bottom of the chart. Thus, in this example, 28% of Material A and 72% of Material B are needed to yield the desired viscosity of 900 cps at a total polymer concentration of 3%. Limitations of Blending: The relationship between viscosity and concentration can vary significantly, depending on the chemical composition as well as the molecular weight (viscosity type) of the polymers involved. The greatest accuracy is obtained from use of the equation or the blending chart Figure 9 if the following conditions are met. Departure from these conditions can result in deviation from the predicted value of viscosity.
Figure 9
Figure 10
Effect of Shear
Figure 12
When viscosity (shear stress divided by shear rate) is plotted against shear rate, a Newtonian system gives a horizontal line. If viscosity decreases as shear rate is increased, the flow is pseudoplastic.
Figure 14A
ThixotropyIf long-chain polymers have a considerable amount of interaction, they will tend to develop a three-dimensional structure and exhibit a phenomenon known as thixotropy.
Figure 15 illustrates thixotropy in another manner. At a constant shear rate (D = K), viscosity decreases with time. When shear is removed (D = zero), viscosity increases significantly with time.
Figure 16
Figure 17
Effect of Temperature Figure 18
Tests with Aqualon CMC Type 7M have shown that very little polymer degradation takes place if solutions are allowed to stand overnight at room temperature at a pH as low as 2. However, at pH values of 4-5 and temperatures of 150°F, most of the viscosity is lost in 24 hrs. Figure 19
Effect of Mixed Solvents
Stability
|
| Preservatives for Aqualon CMC |
|
Busan 11M1, 85(g) |
Phenol Proxel GXL(j) Sodium benzoate(i) Sodium propionate(i) Sorbates (Na and K salts)(i) |
(g)Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. (h)Dow Chemical Co. (i)Preservatives cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical products. Pertinent regulations indicate maximum use levels (tolerances) in some cases. (j)Zeneca Biocides |
|
|
Compatibility |
| Salt | 10% Solution | 50% or Saturated Solution |
| Aluminum nitrate Aluminum sulfate Ammonium chloride Ammonium nitrate Ammonium sulfate Calcium chloride Calcium nitrate Chromic nitrate Disodium phosphate Ferric chloride Ferric sulfate Ferrous chloride Magnesium chloride Magnesium nitrate Magnesium sulfate Potassium ferricyanide Potassium ferrocyanide Silver nitrate Sodium carbonate Sodium chloride Sodium dichromate Sodium metaborate Sodium nitrate Sodium perborate Sodium sulfate Sodium sulfite Sodium thiosulfate Stannic chloride Zinc chloride Zinc nitrate Zinc sulfate |
P P C C C C C P C P P P C C C C C P C C C C C C C C C P P P P |
P P C C P P P P C P P P C C C C C P C C C C C C P C C P P P P |
| C = Compatible P = Precipitate Note: 1 g of a 1% solution of CMC Type 7H was added to 15 g of salt solution. |
||
| Polyvalent CationsGenerally, divalent cations will not form crosslinked gels with CMC. Viscosity reduction occurs, however, when divalent cations are added to a CMC solution, and it may be accompanied by the formation of a haze. Calcium, barium, cobalt, magnesium, ferrous, and manganous cations will perform this way. S types of Aqualon CMC are only slightly affected by moderate concentrations of divalent cations if the cation is added to the CMC solution. Trivalent salts form insoluble precipitates with CMC. Trace amounts of heavy metal cations of lesser valence also form precipitates. Precipitation occurs by crosslinking, ionic bonding, or complex formation. Included in this classification are cuprous, cupric, silver, ferrous, uranium, chromous, stannous, plumbous, and zirconium cations. Gelation of Solutions The effect of trivalent cations on CMC solutions can be controlled and used to advantage where gelation is desired. Gels of varying texture can be produced by careful addition of certain salts of trivalent metals, such as aluminum. Gradual release of aluminum ions to a CMC solution will result in uniform crosslinking of the polymer molecules between carboxymethyl groups. Gradual release of aluminum ions can be accomplished by using a slowly soluble aluminum salt such as monobasic aluminum acetate, AIOH (C2H3O2)2 ; soluble salts such as aluminum sulfate, Al2 (SO4)3 , in combination with appropriate chelating agents; or insoluble salts such as dihydroxyaluminum sodium carbonate (DASC), Al(OH)2 OCOONa, followed by in situ formation of the soluble acid form of DASC. Properties of CMC gels depend on many factors. In general, the stiffness of a CMC gel increases with:
Techniques for producing CMC gels by crosslinking with trivalent metals are discussed in more detail in Aqualon Bulletin VC-521 and Bulletin VC-522. |
| Polymer | Viscosity of a 1% Solution at 25°C, cps (mPas) | Viscosity Viscosity of a Blend of Equal Parts at 25°C, cps (mPas) 25°C, cps (mPas) | |
|
Expected(k)
|
Actual
|
||
| Cellulose gum, Type 7H3SF Natrosol 250 HR |
1,500 1,800 |
1,650 | 3,200 |
| Cellulose gum, Type 7H3SF Klucel H |
1,500 1,640 |
1,570 | 3,280 |
|
(k)From blending chart, VC-440. |
|||
| The products and related information provided by Hercules are for manufacturing use only. Hercules makes no express, implied, or other representation, warranty, or guarantee concerning (i) the handling, use, or application of such products, whether alone, in combination with other products, or otherwise, (ii) the completeness, definitiveness, or adequacy of such information for users or other purposes, (iii) the quality of such products, except that such products are of Hercules' standard quality. Users are advised to make their own tests to determine the safety and suitability of each such product or product combination for their own purposes. Read and understand the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) before using this product. © Hercules Incorporated, 2000. |